simply efficient shopping

Energy conservation is not as sexy a windmills

Let’s face it energy conservation isn’t the sexiest subject in the world. Start a conversation with “how many inches of insulation have you got in your loft?” and the eyes glaze over! However. “How much money are you generating from your solar panels?” is a lot more exciting. Plus, instead of having a Greenpeace sticker on your 4 x 4, the panels show everyone how green you are! Whilst renewable energy has got to be a major part of meeting our future energy needs, we shouldn’t overlook the energy that can be saved through energy conservation and energy efficiency. That’s why it made me laugh to read, this weekend, of the Guardian and Ecotricity’s offer of the chance to win free electricity for a year. It completely misses the opportunity to mention how customers could save energy and money. They want you to use the £635* they are offering over 12 months:  No prizes for using less. Just business a usual whether the energy comes from windmills or fossils fuels. How about a competition providing free energy monitors to new Ecotricity customers and a prize of a years free subscription to the Guardian, for those who can save the most?

Sust-it has been showing consumers how they can save money and energy by choosing the most energy efficient appliances for over five years; Energy conservation and energy efficiency makes sense but not enough money. That’s why, as a report from the Association for the Conservation of Energy has noted of the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) that: “The vast majority of senior staff are assigned to energy generation rather than energy saving”? And there is no clear target or ambition for energy efficiency savings. It’s frustrating that so much more could be done at EU level to address energy demand reduction through a more radical approach to new buildings and refurbishment, as Bruce Tofield and Martin Ingham, of the UEA Low Carbon Innovation Centre and Build with CaRe, have called for in their recent report. The low carbon Passivhaus approach they advocate reduces energy demand and energy efficient appliances have to be part of that, together with changing behaviour to energy consumption – which is why giving electricity away for free, as with the Guardian / Ecotricity offer, doesn’t help people to value it or conserve it.

*The prize has a value of up to £635 and is based upon an average price (as of 29 February 2012) for an Ecotricity New Energy customer consuming 4,152kWh of electricity a year (DECC 2011).

Posted in News | Comments Off on Energy conservation is not as sexy a windmills

Energy literacy, or just plain energy aware!

It’s good news that a committee of MPs is looking into why consumers are shying away from from the energy market, as Ofgem pushes for simpler tariffs from the energy companies. Ofgem is looking for energy suppliers to have one standard tariff for each of the three payment methods – pre-payment meter, cheque, and direct debit – and per fuel.

One issue identified is that consumers don’t understand the language of energy, Kilowatt hours (kWh) and how that relates to bills. Or is there another issue here? Do consumers know what there home appliances, electric heaters and electricals cost to run? From our experience they don’t!

My first taste of becoming ‘energy literate’, the term being used, I prefer the phrase ‘energy aware‘, was in the seventies (showing may age here) when, as a child, I fed the electric meter under the stairs with coins. If the emersion heater or electric fire was on it was a endless task of finding the next 10p coin (Two Shillings), or a trip to the shops to get some change, as the house was plunged into darkness! You soon got grips with what was using power, as the spinning disk on meter picked up speed!

Pre-payment meter, cheque, and direct debit – and per fuel

Sust-it’s website came about because of our frustration at the lack of meaningful information for consumers about how much electricals actually cost to run. We’re all bombarded with energy information, from energy labels, car CO2 emissions, home energy performance certificates, and even the solar panel gold rush has educated many people on financial benefits of the Kilowatt. But do they mean anything to the consumers about to buy a new TV or turning the fan heater on? Probably not!

Energy labels, are one example of how it could be far simpler to get over the value of energy; these labels are already starting to display Kilowatt hours (kWh) which most consumers don’t understand. So why not convert that into running cost, as our site does? The average cost of a unit of electricity in the UK is around 0.14p per Kilowatt hour, so the maths for most products is fairly straightforward.

The other major obstacle to people switching energy supplier is the hassle involved, see previous post. Finally, how can Ofgem propose one standard tariff for each energy suppliers tariff according to payment methods, when you pay different amounts for your electricity, dependent on your postcode! I’m afraid to say your energy prices are a postcode lottery too!

Posted in News | Comments Off on Energy literacy, or just plain energy aware!

Rogue solar PV installers claim 43.3p feed-in tariff

A disreputable minority of solar panel installers are exploiting the confusion over the feed-in tariff caused by recent legal action, and promising returns that they may not be able to guarantee.

A disreputable minority of solar panel installers

These installers are promising that the rate of government subsidy on solar PV panels will be 43.3p per kWh generated. In fact, due to an ongoing legal battle, this cannot be guaranteed. Consumers may only get a feed-in tariff rate of 21p per kWh.

A search for solar installers on Google brings up three companies on the first page claiming to offer the 43.3p tariff rate. There are also many misleading ads in local and national papers and landing on people’s door mats.

If you install a 4kW system based on an expectation of 43.3p, and the government wins its appeal to the Supreme Court, you will receive £20,000* less than you had calculated over the 25 year term of the feed-in tariff.

YouGen’s advice to people interested in solar panels is to go ahead only if you are happy with the returns given by a 21p feed-in tariff rate. Then if the government loses its appeal, and the rate does go back to 43.3p for installations with an eligibility date before 3 March 2012, you will have a very nice bonus.

If a company says that they can guarantee the higher rate, show them the door, or put down the phone.

There are many honest and reputable solar installers who will do a good job. If people want to protect themselves from solar cowboys, they should:

check that the company is MCS accredited, and members of the REAL Assurance Scheme
Get three quotes. Ask for references from previous customers, or check consumer feedback in the YouGen directory.

by Cathy Debenham – YouGen

Posted in Solar PV | Comments Off on Rogue solar PV installers claim 43.3p feed-in tariff

Radiator Booster MK3, do they work?

Is this a prime example of a so-called eco and energy saving product that is misleading? How can a fan connected to the top of your radiator save you £140 per year? Doubtful! There’s a clue in the name ‘radiators’ they work by radiating heat – hot air rises, no moving parts needed, simple! According to the PR video made for this product it expels trapped air, now I’m confused, where is this air trapped? Hot air rises, that’s how radiators work, why do you need 1.5 watt fan to do this! Saying you could reduce your room temperature by 3°C by adding one of these Radiator Boosters is optimistic! How many Radiators boosters would you need?

See the most energy efficient...

Washing Machines Fridges Televisions Set Top Boxes Laptops Inkjet MFDs Lighting Heaters Vehicles Vacuums Kettles Toasters Irons

← SWIPE →

We’re all for energy saving innovations, but will a radiator booster really do much more than make a noise, and create for more CO2 emissions in it’s manufacture and distribution than it will ever save! My advice would to make a draught excluder out of an old pair of tights and save yourself £25!  This is exactly why we don’t promote eco and so-called ‘energy saving’ products, just to make money!

Heating Electricity Cost Calculator

Were Solar Panel installers ripping consumers off?

Just prior to the mad panic to install solar PV panels, we got together a couple of estimates for installing a system. The process was an interesting experience: The first company were trying to sell us cheap Far Eastern PV panels, which at first glance looked good value at £8,258, the sort of prices appearing in the media for a low end 4kW system.  It was only on closer examination that we realised that their quote was for not for a 4kW system, which had the maximum FiT return, but for a much lower output system, 1.6 kW.  We rejected them very quickly!  In effect this would have cost us £20,000 for non-branded panels.

The other supplier, who had installed our heat pump 6 years earlier. Had emailed us to say they were now offering PV installations, the bandwagon was moving fast! I asked them to provide a quote for a 4kW PV installation with well known Japanese branded PV panels and inverter. The price came back at the expected £12k,  again the sort of figures you would see around in the press and online. Then the bombshell feed-in-tariffs were slashed by 50 per cent!  Let the PV panic begin!

The phone calls started; “yes, we can install your system before 12th December, as long as you send £500 today! I must admit that I thought the installations cost were high, £3000 for two man days of work! (one electrician, and a labourer!). My gut feeling was that panels and inverters should have dropped in price due to demand and take-up of FiT. In the end, we decided not to risk installing a system on financial grounds, and foreseeing the panic to get the panels registered and commissioned in time to get the old tariff.

Then, miraculously last week, the company resent their quotation with a £2500 reduction for exactly the same system!  Claiming surplus stock – yet prior to 12th December, other suppliers could not source panels due to the demand to get systems in place before the FiT change. So Chris Huhne was right when he stated that the real price of PV panels had dropped dramatically. I didn’t believe that the price of panels was being reflected in the market place, and expected that, after the feed-in-tariff reduction, prices would drop in six to twelve months time, not a week after the deadline!

The renewable energy sector certainly needed kick-starting. However, is there a strong argument that PV installers were profiteering? Or was it a case of bad green policymaking driving greed and not generating the sustainable, long term green jobs we need?

Energy Efficient Living — News, Hints & Tips